After creating several full-text indexes from tables to a Full-text
Catalog, I can see the names of the tables for those indexes. However,
when double-clicking the Full-text Catalog, the the item count was still
zero.
I am sure the Microsoft Search Service started and there was a Full-Text
Search in EM's Support Services folder. My SQL Server databses is the
back-end database for a front-end SharePoint Services server.
Is something wrong with the configuration on my SQL Server databases, or
the SharePoint Services server?
TIA,
Jeffrey
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
Jeffrey,
Most likely as this is a FAQ in this newsgroup... Review all of the
following KB articles:
317746 (Q317746) PRB: SQL Server Full-Text Search Does Not Populate Catalogs
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;317746
277549 (Q277549) PRB: Unable to Build Full-Text Catalog After You Modify
MSSQLServer Logon Account Through [NT4.0) Control Panel [or Win2K Component
Services]
http://support.microsoft.com/default...B;EN-US;277549
837367 How to turn on full-text search (FTS) in WSS (SharePoint) on a
Windows SBS 2003-based computer
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=837367
Hope that helps!
John
SQL Full Text Search Blog
http://spaces.msn.com/members/jtkane/
"Jeffrey Wang" <cjeffwang@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:#ABhKdSIFHA.1528@.TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> After creating several full-text indexes from tables to a Full-text
> Catalog, I can see the names of the tables for those indexes. However,
> when double-clicking the Full-text Catalog, the the item count was still
> zero.
> I am sure the Microsoft Search Service started and there was a Full-Text
> Search in EM's Support Services folder. My SQL Server databses is the
> back-end database for a front-end SharePoint Services server.
> Is something wrong with the configuration on my SQL Server databases, or
> the SharePoint Services server?
> TIA,
> Jeffrey
>
>
> *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.codecomments.com ***
> Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
Showing posts with label full-text. Show all posts
Showing posts with label full-text. Show all posts
Monday, March 26, 2012
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Issue with full-text query (containstable)..
I've got a full-text index on a table 'items' with an image field
'item' into which I've imported word and pdf documents. I've only got
~10 docs imported currently, for testing. I know that each of these
documents, except for one, includes the term 'ontology' or
'ontologies'.
I've got the following query, which gives back only two of these
documents (1 word, 1 pdf):
select i.*, ct.rank as incl_ctr
from items i inner join
containstable(items, item,
' ("class*" and "info*") or "ontology" '
) ct on i.id = ct.[key]
where (ct.rank > 1) and i.incl_ext in ('.doc','.pdf')
order by ct.rank desc;
I know this is incomplete, based on the content of each document, which
is an issue I'd like to work out; but prior to that, if I write the
query with "onto*" as a prefix term instead of "ontology", it only
gives back one of the two docs (the pdf):
select i.*, ct.rank as incl_ctr
from items i inner join
containstable(items, item,
' ("class*" and "info*") or "onto*" '
) ct on i.id = ct.[key]
where (ct.rank > 1) and i.incl_ext in ('.doc','.pdf')
order by ct.rank desc;
I can't identify why this is. I'd be very interested in whatever input
I could get on this..
Installed evaluation version: 2000 - 8.00.194 on Windows XP.
Installing the pdf ifilter improves the circumstance described in the
initial post; yet I think it's odd that onto* yields fewer docs in that
query than ontology, which continues to be the case..
'item' into which I've imported word and pdf documents. I've only got
~10 docs imported currently, for testing. I know that each of these
documents, except for one, includes the term 'ontology' or
'ontologies'.
I've got the following query, which gives back only two of these
documents (1 word, 1 pdf):
select i.*, ct.rank as incl_ctr
from items i inner join
containstable(items, item,
' ("class*" and "info*") or "ontology" '
) ct on i.id = ct.[key]
where (ct.rank > 1) and i.incl_ext in ('.doc','.pdf')
order by ct.rank desc;
I know this is incomplete, based on the content of each document, which
is an issue I'd like to work out; but prior to that, if I write the
query with "onto*" as a prefix term instead of "ontology", it only
gives back one of the two docs (the pdf):
select i.*, ct.rank as incl_ctr
from items i inner join
containstable(items, item,
' ("class*" and "info*") or "onto*" '
) ct on i.id = ct.[key]
where (ct.rank > 1) and i.incl_ext in ('.doc','.pdf')
order by ct.rank desc;
I can't identify why this is. I'd be very interested in whatever input
I could get on this..
Installed evaluation version: 2000 - 8.00.194 on Windows XP.
Installing the pdf ifilter improves the circumstance described in the
initial post; yet I think it's odd that onto* yields fewer docs in that
query than ontology, which continues to be the case..
Monday, February 20, 2012
Issue about full-text index
Hi: all,
I have created a full text index on a column(column1) in a table(table1).
There is one record in the table1. And for example, the column1 stores "Documents".
Table1.Column1:"Documents"
When I run the query:
select * from Table1 where contains(Column1,'Documents')
There is 1 one row be selected.
But when I run the query:
select * from Table1 where contains(Column1,'cum')
There is no row be selected.
So the contains can only search the whole word,right?
Can I search a part of the whole word?
Just like the result of : select * from Table1 where Column1 like '%cum%'?
Thanks,
Tracy
You can search the part of the word but only with Prefixed wild card...
select * from Table1 where contains(Column1,'"Doc*"')|||So sql server full-text index doesn't support to search any part of a word, right?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)